That is still not a reason for confusion, if the "experts" have an opinion contrary to the scientific consensus and do not have the data to defend that opinion they can be safely ignored. No matter what you believe, there will be “experts” to back you up or tear you down. No it does not, causing hospitalizations with still a small number of detected cases makes it obvious it is much worse than the vaccine. This variant is weak, but will give natural antibodies.
![omicron storm in a teacup omicron storm in a teacup](https://images.foxtv.com/m107833-mcdn.mp.lura.live/iupl/8F5/833/1280/720/8F5833BC6D0C7EF9E28ED45773B90DC7.jpg)
After the initial sinking feeling on Friday on hearing the news, I reflected on how lucky we are in Australia. Well at the time of writing (Midday) the market currently remains undecided, down just 16 points on Friday’s close. And honestly, this seems like a poor opinion from a medical professional.
![omicron storm in a teacup omicron storm in a teacup](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_InsLWVhtrE/maxresdefault.jpg)
As the saying goes, 'better to be safe than sorry'. no thanks We sat on the original virus outbreak for a few weeks, and look where that got us. The DOCTOR that FOUND the variant says that it's basically a nothing sandwich.įinding something and having the data to prove it is not risky are two very different things, nobody has that data yet, so this is a completely irrelevant appeal to authority. The AFR today are leading with a doomsday headline: Omnicron arrives, ASX to tumble. ‘But for now, it is a storm in a tea cup, we have only become aware of this viral mutation in the last week. Unless you can demonstrate the omicron variant is less risky than the vaccine this baseless recommendation makes no sense at al.
![omicron storm in a teacup omicron storm in a teacup](https://www.jesus-our-blessed-hope.com/uploads/8/7/5/0/87500100/image-2021-11-29-110025_orig.png)
Yeah, give the old and vulnerable the mRNA vaccines and let the rest get this natural omicron "vaccine."